As some Google searches will prove, this has been a debate that has been going on for some time. I was actually faced with the same problem just today, and not because I wanted to write a post about it, but because I had a practical problem I needed to solve. The problem has two parts. One is solved by Picasa, the other is solved by Windows Photo Gallery. In the process, I tried to determine which is better, without success. I have developed a method though that works for me, so perhaps it has some workarounds that might for you too, read on!
First if all, let me state the problem. I travel, I take pics, I store my pics and look at them, try and find one from time to time. I want to be able to tag them, rate them, email them, upload them, geotag them all with one click, and this is proving to be very difficult. I took Windows Picture Gallery for a spin and I was amazed.
Tagging
The guys at Microsoft did an awesome job of making a program that not only organizes your photos but lets you search, filter and group them in productive ways. Best of all, and this is the point where Microsoft gets top marks, tags are stored inside the file info. This means that if I copy all the photos from my recent Prague visit to my girlfriend’s laptop, she won’t have to go and tag everything again, she will see all the tags I have put in and all the ratings I have chosen.
<--adsense#old-->
Picasa on the other hand uses databases, which aren’t bad, but have two drawbacks. One is that they are separate from the files themselves, so if I reinstall my system and don’t use the special backup method I will loose all metadata (yes, this has happened, grrr). The other problem is that no matter how well a database works, it gets slower as the database grows. And we all know what the digital era did to us from a photo standpoint. “Oh wait, let me take 20 more pictures of this!”
I also enjoy Windows Gallery’s tagging structure a lot more. I can create child tags, that are part of larger ones. I won’t have an endless list of tags, I now have “Places” as a top level tag and “Places/Prague” as a child tag. This leaves me with an easily hand searched directory. I feel that Picasa doesn’t give you quite the flexibility it could here.
Extras
In the extras department Picasa wins by miles. The reason I started using Picasa in the first place was the ability to one-click upload whatever I want into Picasaweb, to share it with my friends. The other main selling point was geitagging, which allowed me to put my photos on the map, using Google Earth. There are tons of other extras like timelines, blogging utilities, and so on and so forth, but I think the above two are the most noteworthy. Windows Photo Gallery doesn’t have too much to offer here. It has some here and there, like Email, burn to disc, make a movie, but nothing Picasa couldn’t handle.
The problem
For me, the perfect system would allow me to write my metadata to the file itself. This way I could send my girlfriend all the photos packaged and ready for her viewing pleasure. It would also allow me to backup or reinstall my system in 3 minutes, instead of 3 grueling hours. I do also need easy uploading into Picasaweb, since the platform is great and I can really easily share my stuff. I also absolutely need geotagging, that is the most fun since bottled Ice Tea (Lipton, Lemon of course).
The solution
Those of you waiting for an extension, or radically awesome productivity and organization hack will be a bit disappointed. My solution is to ditch Picasa. I am a total Google lover and I love Picasa too, but it needed to be done. The reason is that uploading and geotagging can be done from Picasaweb itself, but there is no way Picasa will read tags from the files.
I am still thinking of not ditching it totally, but only using it for geotagging. Since I upload to specific galleries, like “Prague 2007″ I don’t really need tags on Picasaweb. I do want to see my photos on Google Earth (the desktop program), so it would be nice to be able to save them as places, which is much easier if I do the geotagging before the upload.
Conclusion
I’ll be damned if I know which is better. Windows Photo Gallery is much better at managing and organizing I think, while Picasa has better other features. If you don’t need such great organization go for Picasa, it’s awesome, if you desperately want to put your photos in order, go for Windows Photo Gallery.











Linda Martin-Peoples's Thoughts
at 11:11 am
And now we know! Thanks for a great analysis!
~Linda~
Windows Photo Gallery or Google’s Picasa - www.Tech-Dump.com's Thoughts
at 12:11 pm
[...] News Source: http://hackyourday.com/2007/12/30/windows-photo-gallery-or-googles-picasa/ [...]
Corel print house 6's Thoughts
at 2:58 pm
Thanks for a great analysis!:)
Best!
Jason's Thoughts
at 11:19 pm
For your specific situation I can see the problem, but if you look at a bigger picture, Picasa will run on Win,Mac,Linux. I would also suggest you put your suggestions for embeding the tagging in the metadata of the pic on the Google Group for Picasa http://groups.google.com/group/Picasa
Daniel's Thoughts
at 11:46 pm
Hi Jason!
I think this is a situation most of us are in. I mean unless the metadata is written to the file, there is no easy way to share your files, with the data included.
I do appreciate Picasa though and if it would support this I would switch without thinking, I love Google
Will put up the suggestion thanks!
Dana's Thoughts
at 10:50 pm
Responding to Jason, Picasa does not run on Mac. They only now have a beta version for linux but nothing for Mac. I love Picasa but as a pro have had to use ACDSee for years. It costs money but has been around for years. Aperture and Lightroom are only catching up.
Hack Your Day - A productivity blog | Why I like Vista's Thoughts
at 12:55 am
[...] in to the start menu (and otherwise awesome search as well), it has Windows Photo Gallery (read my post on it) and a host of other features which actually work. Maybe it’s just me, but for once I [...]
jciv's Thoughts
at 6:39 pm
Picasa also stores metadata in the files. It uses the database for speed and to record what photos you put in albums. If you loose the database, you do loose any albums (last time I checked), but no metadata. Picasa just rescans the photos and rebuilds the database.